Feb 3, 2010 by Bruce
This ought to ruin Pat Leahy’s day
And Chuck Schumer’s, Dick Durbin’s, Russ Feingold’s – shoot, even Al Franken’s. If they’re paying attention, that is. Any Senate Judiciary Committee Democrat who has ever contributed to the glut of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by continually pontificating against “extremist right-wingers” on the Supreme Court who are supposedly way, way “out-of-the-mainstream” are going to have trouble explaining this poll.
Seems that 58% of Americans would prefer the Supreme Court to keep the definition of marriage intact, but only 52% expect it to do so, when the Prop 8 case, Perry v. Schwarzenegger reaches there.
Now, I don’t know how Chairman Leahy and his board of mis-directors (a/k/a Judiciary Dems) define “mainstream” judicial philosophy, but it appears that the American public (I’d say 58% qualifies as “mainstream,” wouldn’t you?) views it as a few degrees to the right of where the Court is now. In other words, THEY WANT MORE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES in the future, not fewer.
So, my dear friends on the Left, when Justice Stevens retires this summer (I’m not saying he is or isn’t, just repeatin’ rumors), please don’t crank up the old “we must stop the ultra right-wing takeover of the Court” meme in order to justify another liberal appointment to the Court. You can’t protect the President on this one.
This poll shows that Americans want marriage to remain marriage. They want justices smart enough to figure out that same-sex marriage is not in the Constitution. And, in a happy coincidence, we may have an opening for just such a justice this summer.
You can either listen to what America is saying, or memorize six words: Martha Coakley, John Corzine, Creigh Deeds.
Thanks, Dawn. Good points.
Sorry, Ex-GOP Voter. Dawn and I meant to address your comments days ago, and we just forgot.
I had one further comment on my post. Lest I be misunderstood, the actual test for judges is not whether they are pro-life or pro-traditional marriage in their heart of hearts (although I wish that everyone held that view). The question is whether they think the Constitution contains the “right” to abortion or the “right” to same-sex marriage. The answer to that question tells me whether they’re qualified to be judges or not.
Actually, in the last year we’ve seen multiple polling that indicates that the majority of Americans are more pro-life than we’ve ever seen.
With Roe. v. Wade, most mainstream poll questions don’t even come close to accurately describing what the decision means. But when people understand more about Roe, their views start to change. See the Roe IQ test at http://www.roeiqtest.com/ui/
-Dawn, bioethics analyst and Bruce’s colleague
So how should we factor in all the recent polls that have shown America is split on pro-life/pro-choice, but by a big majority, don’t want R v Wade overturned?