<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Media Bias and the “Gay” Vultures of Jerusalem</title> <atom:link href="http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/2009/09/media-bias-and-the-%e2%80%9cgay%e2%80%9d-vultures-of-jerusalem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/2009/09/media-bias-and-the-%e2%80%9cgay%e2%80%9d-vultures-of-jerusalem/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:08:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Caleb</title><link>http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/2009/09/media-bias-and-the-%e2%80%9cgay%e2%80%9d-vultures-of-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link> <dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/?p=1038#comment-216</guid> <description>Alex, thanks for your comment positing the possibility that these vultures could be bisexual.As discussed in the penguin posting, I would argue for caution when it comes to attempts to superimpose upon animals and their observable sexual and parenting behavior what we believe we know about human sexuality and parenting – let alone try to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/homosexuality/theology/A000011043.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;derive human morality from animal behavior&lt;/a&gt;.The main point of this post was to highlight an unabashedly pro-gay bias by the media in their treatment of the supposed “homosexuality” of two male vultures. Given that neither article mentioned bisexuality as a possibility – and instead portrayed Dashik and Yehuda as “gay” in spite of the fact that they are now coupled with females – only reinforces the point.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, thanks for your comment positing the possibility that these vultures could be bisexual.</p><p>As discussed in the penguin posting, I would argue for caution when it comes to attempts to superimpose upon animals and their observable sexual and parenting behavior what we believe we know about human sexuality and parenting – let alone try to <a
href="http://www.citizenlink.org/FOSI/homosexuality/theology/A000011043.cfm" rel="nofollow">derive human morality from animal behavior</a>.</p><p>The main point of this post was to highlight an unabashedly pro-gay bias by the media in their treatment of the supposed “homosexuality” of two male vultures. Given that neither article mentioned bisexuality as a possibility – and instead portrayed Dashik and Yehuda as “gay” in spite of the fact that they are now coupled with females – only reinforces the point.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: phoenixmd</title><link>http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/2009/09/media-bias-and-the-%e2%80%9cgay%e2%80%9d-vultures-of-jerusalem/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link> <dc:creator>phoenixmd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:35:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://citizenlinkblog.com/drivethru/?p=1038#comment-209</guid> <description>Caleb, how do you know these vultures aren&#039;t bisexual?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caleb, how do you know these vultures aren&#8217;t bisexual?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)

Served from: agaacqmaoa.c03.gridserver.com @ 2010-03-15 00:57:11 -->